Systematic analysis of communicative efficiency between rule-based chatbots and natural language models

Main Article Content

Mao Garzón-Quiroz
Guillermo Del Campo-Saltos
Beatriz Loor-Ávila

Abstract

The study was grounded in a systematic literature review on the communicative efficiencies of rule-based conversational agents and those powered by natural language models with artificial intelligence. A total of 175 documents were analyzed as the basis for this review. Additionally, a historical analysis of the first recorded conversational agent, ELIZA, developed in 1966, was included, highlighting its pivotal
role in the emergence of rule-based systems. The study also delved into the arguments underpinning the
significant differences between rule-based conversational agents and those leveraging natural language
models. These differences revealed that rule-based systems are simple and cost-effective tools, ideal for
repetitive and structured tasks, yet constrained in managing complex interactions. Conversely, agents
powered by natural language models enable more adaptive and personalized interactions, albeit requiring substantial investment in data and development. According to the findings, the choice between these approaches depends on the application context, available resources, and the specific needs of the organization. Furthermore, the research underscored the evolution of conversational agents and their transformative impact across various sectors. In this regard, the results open pathways to explore how emerging technological trends, such as advanced natural
language processing models, can enhance the efficiency and applicability of these systems while addressing the ethical and technical challenges associated with their implementation in diverse industries.

Article Details

Section
Miscellaneous