Assessment of fuel related data in the Metropolitan District of Quito for modeling and simulation of wildfires, case study: Atacazo Hill wildfire

Main Article Content

Juan Gabriel Mollocana Lara
César Iván Álvarez Mendoza
Luis Jonathan Jaramillo Coronel


The Metropolitan District of Quito (DMQ) does not have all the information needed to design wildfire management strategies based on models and simulations. This work evaluated the use of information related to wildfires in the DMQ obtained from governmental and free sources, using the case study of the Atacazo Hill wildfire (09/29/2018). Topographic, meteorological and fuel data from different sources were processed. The topographic information was obtained from the topographic sheets of the Military Geographical Institute; the meteorological information was obtained from Guamaní station of the Metropolitan Network of Atmospheric Monitoring of Quito, and the fuel and vegetation cover information was estimated based on vegetation and alteration level categories of the coverage and land use map of the Thematic Cartography at Scale 1:25000 of Ecuador Project, executed by the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Aquaculture, and Fisheries. The major paths and the fire arrival times were simulated on FlamMap for two different cases. In Case 1, the simulation included fire barriers based on OpenStreetMap data. Additional information gathered during field visits was included in Case 2. Satellite imagery was used to compare the real wildfire extent with the simulated extent using Sorensen and Cohen’s kappa coefficients, obtaining 0.81 and 0.85 for Case 1,and 0.78 and 0.81 for Case 2, respectively. These results showed great similarity between the behavior of the model and the real wildfire. After the model was validated, it was applied to estimate the wildfire behavior in various scenarios of interest; it was found that the design of fire barriers based on simulations has great potential to reduce theaffected area of a wildfire.
Abstract 100 | PDF (Español (España)) Downloads 28 PDF Downloads 30 HTML (Español (España)) Downloads 0 EPUB (Español (España)) Downloads 0


Andrews, P. (2018). The rothermel surface fire spread model and associated developments: A comprehensive explanation. USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report RMRS-GTR, 371:1–121. Online:

Bakhshaii, A. and Johnson, E. (2019). A review of a new generation of wildfire-atmosphere mode ling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 49(6):565– 574. Online:

Banko, G. (1998). A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data and of Methods Including Remote Sensing Data in Forest Inventory. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Online:

Barkhordarian, A., Saatchi, S., Behrangi, A., Loikith, P., and Mechoso, C. (2019). A recent systematic increase in vapor pressure deficit over tropical south america. Scientific reports, 9(1):1–12. Online:

Botequim, B., Fernandes, P., Borges, J., González, E., and Guerra, J. (2019). Improving silvicultural practices for mediterranean forests through fire behaviour modelling using lidar-derived canopy fuel characteristics. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 28(11):823–839. Online:

Botequim, B., Fernandes, P., Garcia, J., Silva, A., and Borges, J. (2017). Coupling fire behaviour mode lling and stand characteristics to assess and mitigate fire hazard in a maritime pine landscape in portugal. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(3):527–542. Online:

Conver, J., Falk, D., Yool, S., and Parmenter, R. (2018). Modeling fire pathways in montane grassland-forest ecotones. Fire Ecology, 14(1):17– 32. Online:

DeMagalhães, S., Ribeiro, C., Castro, J., Fernandes, P., Silva, C., Pinheiro, H., and Azevedo, J. (2017). Fire behaviour in different periods and configurations of a landscape in northeastern portugal. Ciência Florestal, 27(2):457–469. Online:

DMQ Fire Department (2018). Plan de Prevención y Respuesta a Incendios Forestales 2018. Cuerpo de Bomberos DMQ. Online:

Elia, M., Lafortezza, R., Lovreglio, R., and Sanesi, G. (2015). Developing custom fire behavior fuel models for mediterranean wildland–urban inter faces in southern italy. Environmental management, 56(3):754–764. Online:

Finney, M. (2006). An overview of flammap fire modeling capabilities. In Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings, page 213–220.

Fitch, R., Kim, Y., Waltz, A., and Crouse, J. (2018). Changes in potential wildland fire suppression costs due to restoration treatments in northern arizona ponderosa pine forests. Forest policy and economics, 87:101–114. Online:

Government of Canada (2020). Fire management. Online:

Govil, K., Welch, M., Ball, J., and Pennypacker, C. (2020). Preliminary results from a wildfire detection system using deep learning on remote ca mera images. Remote Sensing, 12(1):1–15. Online:

Hernández, L., White, S., Del Rey, A., and Sánchez, G. (2007). Modelling forest fire spread using hexagonal cellular automata. Applied mathematical modelling, 31(6):1213–1227. Online:

Jahdi, R., Salis, M., Arabi, M., and Arca, B. (2019). Fire modelling to assess spatial patterns of wildfire exposure in ardabil, nw iran. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, page 577–581. Online:

Jahdi, R., Salis, M., Darvishsefat, A., Alcasena, F., Mostafavi, M., Etemad, V., Lozano, O., and Spano, D. (2016). Evaluating fire modelling systems in recent wildfires of the golestan national park, iran. Forestry, 89(2):136–149. Online:

Jakubowksi, M., Guo, Q., Collins, B., Stephens, S., and Kelly, M. (2013). Predicting surface fuel models and fuel metrics using lidar and cir imagery in a dense, mountainous forest. Photogrammetric Engineering y Remote Sensing, 79(1):37–49. Online:

MAAE (2020). Mapa interactivo. Accessed: 5 October 2020. Online:

MAGAP (2015). Memoria tecnica DMQ - Proyecto Cartografía Temática Escala 1:25000.

Moore, P., Hardesty, J., Kelleher, S., Maginnis, S., and Myers, R. (2003). Forest and wildfires: fixing the futures by avoiding the past. XII World Forestry Congress. Online:

Mujtaba, T. and Wani, M. (2018). Object detection from satellite imagery using deep learning. In 5th IEEE international conference on computing for sustainable global development.

NASA (2021). Firms. Online:

Palaiologou, P., Kalabokidis, K., Ager, A., and Day, M. (2020). Development of comprehensive fuel management strategies for reducing wildfire risk in greece. Forests, 11(8):789. Online:

Rigolot, E., Castelli, L., Cohen, M., Costa, M., and Duché, Y. (2004). Recommendations for fuelbreak design and fuel management at the wildland urban interface: an empirical approach in south eastern france. In Institute of Mediterranean forest ecosystems and forest products warm international workshop, Athènes, pages 131–142. Online:

Rios, O., Valero, M., Pastor, E., and Planas, E. (2019). A data-driven fire spread simulator: Validation in vall-llobrega’s fire. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 5:1–11. Online:

Scott, J. and Burgan, R. (2005). Standard fire behavior fuel models: A comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report RMRS-GTR. Online:

Secretaría de Seguridad DMQ (2015). Atlas de amenazas naturales y exposición de infraestructura del distrito metropolitano de quito. Online:

Shinneman, D., Germino, M., Pilliod, D., Aldridge, C., Vaillant, N., and Coates, P. (2019). The ecological uncertainty of wildfire fuel breaks: examples from the sagebrush steppe. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(5):279–288. Online:

Srivastava, A., Wu, J., Elliot, W., Brooks, E., and Flanagan, D. (2018). A simulation study to estimate effects of wildfire and forest management on hydrology and sediment in a forested watershed, northwestern us. Transactions of the ASABE, 61(5):1579–1601. Online:

Stefanidou, A., Gitas, I., Korhonen, L., Stavrakoudis, D., and Georgopoulos, N. (2020). Lidarbased estimates of canopy base height for a dense uneven-aged structured forest. Remote Sensing, 12(10):1565. Online:
Stratton, R. (2009). Guidebook on LANDFIRE Fuels Data Acquisition, Critique, Modification, Maintenance, and Model Calibration. Critique.

Xofis, P., Konstantinidis, P., Papadopoulos, I., and Tsiourlis, G. (2020). Integrating remote sensing methods and fire simulation models to estimate fire hazard in a south-east mediterranean protected area. Fire, 3(3):31. Online:

Zigner, K., Carvalho, L., Peterson, S., Fujioka, F., Duine, G., Jones, C., Roberts, D., and Moritz, M. (2020). Evaluating the ability of farsite to simulate wildfires influenced by extreme, downslope winds in santa barbara, california. Fire, 3(3):29. Online: